Liam Broady vs Dominic Stricker Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Broady vs D. Stricker

Liam Broady
GBR
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
31
Age
23
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
492
C. Rank
243
93
Best Rank
88
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$1.0M
Career Money
$620.2K
Left-Handed
Plays
-

Dominic Stricker
SUI
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
31
Age
23
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
492
C. Rank
243
93
Best Rank
88
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$1.0M
Career Money
$620.2K
Left-Handed
Plays
-
Head-To-Head: Broady 1 - 1 Stricker
They have played 5 sets in total, with Liam Broady winning 3 and Dominic Stricker winning 2. The last match between Dominic Stricker and Liam Broady was at the Lugano Challenger, 10-03-2023, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 3-6 6-3 7-6(4).
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Broady | 1 |
Stricker | 1 |
Last H2H Matches:
(QF) Lugano Challenger(03-10-23)
Dominic Stricker
3
6
7
Liam Broady
6
3
6
(SF) Biel Challenger(09-25-21)
Liam Broady
6
2
Dominic Stricker
0
0
L. Broady vs D. Stricker H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$1,004,050 | Career Prize Money | $620,225 |
57.95% (514-373) | Career Total W/L | 55.74% (136-108) |
1 | Indoor | 1 |
11 | Titles | 5 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 14.29% (1-6) |
L. Broady vs D. Stricker Match Preview
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Liam Broady has won 42.44% of points on their second serve, while Dominic Stricker has won 45.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Liam Broady, in recent form, has won 41.81% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dominic Stricker has won 44.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.35% and 25.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Liam Broady has saved 49.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dominic Stricker has saved 51.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Liam Broady has won 67.74% of matches played (W/L 42/ 20), with Dominic Stricker winning 51.06% (W/L 42/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Liam Broady has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 276/ 163), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 33/ 58). Dominic Stricker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 55/ 36), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 17/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Liam Broady has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.58% of matches (W/L 39/ 14), where as Dominic Stricker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.47% of matches (W/L 13/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Liam Broady winning 1 times and Dominic Stricker being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Liam Broady winning 3 and Dominic Stricker winning 2. The last match between Dominic Stricker and Liam Broady was at the Lugano Challenger, 10-03-2023, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 3-6 6-3 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:25.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Liam Broady has played against opponents with an average rank of 129.48 while Dominic Stricker has played against players with an average rank of 296.51.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Liam Broady has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dominic Stricker has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Liam Broady has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dominic Stricker has converted 32.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Liam Broady vs Dominic Stricker Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Broady vs D. Stricker H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
3 | Sets Won | 2 |
23 | Games Won | 16 |
17 | Aces (Total) | 17 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
1:17:25 | Avg. Match Time | 1:17:25 |
60% (72/121) | 1st Serve % | 47% (55/116) |
72% (52/72) | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (43/55) |
65% (32/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (28/61) |
50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
39% (45/116) | Return Pts Won % | 31% (37/121) |
50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Broady 55%, Stricker 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Broady 55%, Stricker 49%.
Break Points Saved %: Broady 61%, Stricker 55%.
L. Broady Recent Matches Played
D. Stricker Recent Matches Played

L. Broady vs D. Stricker Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
57.95% (514/373) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.74% (136/108) |
56.57% (1162/892) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.18% (324/274) |
52.79% (10214/9134) | Games Win/Loss | 51.20% (2977/2837) |
62.87% (276/163) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.95% (17/20) |
54.93% (78/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.52% (38/33) |
59.07% (127/88) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.75% (65/42) |
36.26% (33/58) | Grass Win/Loss | 55.17% (16/13) |
0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.63 |
2418 | Aces Total | 1806 |
0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
1553 | Total Double Faults | 749 |
1:14:2 | Average Match Time | 1:36:35 |
510.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 344.12 |
63% (29534/47033) | 1st Serve % | 56% (9901/17526) |
68% (20111/29534) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (7380/9901) |
52% (9118/17492) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3920/7625) |
43% (1976/4602) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (604/1562) |
40% (18503/46542) | Return Points Win % | 37% (6732/18126) |
47.27% (26/29) | Slam W/L | 57.58% (19/14) |
56.25% (9/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
45.98% (40/47) | Main Tour W/L | 49.02% (25/26) |
55.50% (227/182) | Challenger W/L | 56.64% (64/49) |
66.46% (210/106) | Futures W/L | 65.12% (28/15) |
59% (504/860) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (124/216) |
35% (6/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (10/20) |
50% (136/270) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (65/120) |
52% (139/266) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (48/86) |
87% (503/438) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (130/108) |
13% (503/64) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (130/18) |
20% (382/76) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (114/28) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
09:03 PM 19/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.46
W2
2.52
11:30 AM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.48
W2
1.54
02:30 PM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.03
W2
1.79
08:00 AM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.45
W2
2.75
04:00 AM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.27
W2
1.56
06:30 AM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
3.2
W2
1.35
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Broady (M15 Hurghada)
Ibrahim vs BroadyCould play in The Final
Samuel vs BroadyCould play in The Final
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
06:00
H2H 3-2
08:00
H2H 3-0
10:50
H2H 2-1
08:00
H2H 2-0
08:00
H2H 1-0
Tennis Events This Week
Chengdu Open - Chengdu
China
Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou
China
Laver Cup - San Francisco
United States
Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
Austria
Columbus Challenger
United States
St. Tropez Challenger
France
Targu Mures 2 Challenger
Romania
Villa Maria Challenger
Argentina
M15 Fayetteville
United States
M25 Guiyang
China
M25 Londrina
Brazil
M25 Takasaki
Japan
M25 Tamworth
Australia